mula
\samplefile{knuth}
\stoptext
\unprotect
\newbox\hightlight_tmp_box
\definemathframed[_highlight][
location=mathematics,
frame=off,
background=color,
backgroundcolor=lightred,
backgroundoffset=0.25ex,
]
\tolerant\def\highlighthere#1\alignhere#2#3\breakhere{%
\setbo
. Changing the test in the .lfg file fixes
the error, but that is not a long-term solution.
The exact message I get in the log is:
mathematics > tweak > 'LibertinusMath-Regular', size 10, math
size 0, version 'Version, 7.040;RELEASE' found, version 'Version
7.040' ex
the error, but that is not a long-term solution.
The exact message I get in the log is:
mathematics > tweak > 'LibertinusMath-Regular', size 10, math
size 0, version 'Version, 7.040;RELEASE' found, version 'Version
7.040' expected
This is not a high-priority issue for me --
on between the objectives sought: writing
documentation with figures, writing a thesis in mathematics and physics,
how to construct figures, or a bibliography. Not to mention the handling
of photographs in an aesthetically demanding layout; all this with the
possibility of showing complete or partia
Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 09.02.2024 um 20:07:
On 2/8/24 22:37, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Ursula,
I think you mean the so-called end of the proof sign, or QED (Quod Erat
Demonstrandum). You can use this:
\definesymbol[QED][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\wordright{\symbol[QED
On 2/8/24 22:37, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi Ursula,
>
> I think you mean the so-called end of the proof sign, or QED (Quod Erat
> Demonstrandum). You can use this:
>
> \definesymbol[QED][\mathematics{\square}]
> \def\qed{\wordright{\symbol[QED]}}
> \starttext
> This is
this:
\definesymbol[QED][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\wordright{\symbol[QED]}}
\starttext
This is the end of our proof. \qed
\stoptext
In principle it is included in ConTeXt, but it seems that in the latest version
I have (2024.01.23), the command \qed is broken.
Best regards: Otared
On 8 Feb 2024
2024 22:37:08
An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Betreff: [NTG-context] Re: Square right aligned
Hi Ursula,
I think you mean the so-called end of the proof sign, or QED (Quod Erat
Demonstrandum). You can use this:
\definesymbol[QED][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\wordright{\symbol[QED
Hi Ursula,
I think you mean the so-called end of the proof sign, or QED (Quod Erat
Demonstrandum). You can use this:
\definesymbol[QED][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\wordright{\symbol[QED]}}
\starttext
This is the end of our proof. \qed
\stoptext
In principle it is included in ConTeXt
ead, I thought I read that you had written a document on the
> use of mathematics with ConTeXt, true or false?
>
It is in the writing, but it takes some time (working on it tonight). I
hope to have it out in some form in a not t
Perhaps the size should be even smaller because I personally find it still
a little large.
PS : In a thread, I thought I read that you had written a document on the
use of mathematics with ConTeXt, true or false?
Le ven. 29 déc. 2023 à 16:14, Mikael Sundqvist a écrit :
> Great, all is g
What do you expect here to pass as argument to the oldfact command?
>
I will pass something like n, 5, 10 etc.
>
> This works here:
>
> \defineenumeration
> [proof]
> [closesymbol={\mathematics{\square}}]
>
> \starttext
>
> \startproof
> \samplefile{lorem}
/maps/36/09.pdf page no. 28 then proof is
defined as
\defineenumeration
[proof]
[ text=Proof,
number=no,
headstyle=italic,
title=no, %this is the default
closesymbol={\mathematics{\square}},
style=normal]
But the closessymbol does not work.
I will create a minimum working example and post
=no, %this is the default
closesymbol={\mathematics{\square}},
style=normal]
But the closessymbol does not work.
I will create a minimum working example and post it as soon as possible.
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 5:44 PM Wolfgang Schuster <
wolfgang.schuster.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shi
b am 09.12.2023 um 17:19:
>>>
>>> Very clear !
>>> In typography for Mathematics books, what choice should we make for the
>>> best possible result ?
>>>
>>> A question better answered by Mikael or Aditya!
>> Thank you for your trust
Am 09.12.23 um 23:30 schrieb Mikael Sundqvist:
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 4:39 PM Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
Fabrice Couvreur schrieb am 09.12.2023 um 17:19:
Very clear !
In typography for Mathematics books, what choice should we make for the best
possible result ?
A question better
Fabrice Couvreur schrieb am 09.12.2023 um 17:19:
Very clear !
In typography for Mathematics books, what choice should we make for
the best possible result ?
A question better answered by Mikael or Aditya!
Wolfgang
'./test', input './test.tex', result './test'
fonts > latin modern fonts are not preloaded
languages > language 'en' is active
open source > level 1, order 2, name './test.tex'
fonts > preloading latin modern fonts (second stage)
mathematics > tweak &
On 10/30/2023 8:05 AM, Mia Bikey wrote:
Yes well of course no issue arises if I just change the whole font.
But I wanted to keep using the mono font thus reporting issues with it.
In that case you have to go for flushleft
\setupalign[verytolerant,nothyphenated,flushleft]
because otherwise tex
On 10/29/2023 1:33 PM, Mia Bikey wrote:
Hi,
I was using \setupalign[verytolerant,stretch] so that the mono font does
not go inside the right inline image but after using that command the
inline math seems to spread.
how about just using this
\setupbodyfont[concrete]
\starttext
When $a, b,
Hi,
I was using \setupalign[verytolerant,stretch] so that the mono font does
not go inside the right inline image but after using that command the
inline math seems to spread.
Here is a Minimal Working Example:
ConTeXt ver: 2023.09.26 18:19 LMTX
\setupbodyfont[10pt, mono]
This is how it
dev without any restriction of usage
because we might want to show them in manuals or articles or
presentations and there is no reason to spend time on them unlees we're
paid for it.
I think that my version is/will be more complete - except for mathematics. Once
some fine-tuning
Mathias' minion.lfg (and associated
type-imp-minion) until just now, had to figure it all out from scratch from
demo.lfg and lm.lfg templates -)
(OTOH, had previously seen yours and Mikael's sophisticated minion-math.lfg)
I think that my version is/will be more complete - except for mathemat
item
> $7(x + \dfrac{5}{14})^2 + \dfrac{199}{28}$
> \stopitem
> \startitem
> $-\dfrac{1}{2}(x + 2)^2 + \dfrac{9}{2}$
> \stopitem
> \stopitemize
> }
> \stopitemize
>
> \stoptext
>
> Alexandre Christe 於 2023年8月22日 週二 上午2:58寫道：
>
>>
itemize
> >
> > \stoptext
> >
> > > Alexandre Christe 於 2023年8月22日 週二 上午2:58寫道：
> > > > Dear ConTeXt users,
> > > >
> > > > Time goes by but I haven't yet found a nice solution to this issue.
> > > > When having ma
titem
> $-\dfrac{1}{2}(x + 2)^2 + \dfrac{9}{2}$
> \stopitem
> \stopitemize
> }
> \stopitemize
>
> \stoptext
>
> Alexandre Christe 於 2023年8月22日 週二 上午2:58寫道：
>>
>> Dear ConTeXt users,
>>
>> Time goes by but I haven't yet found a nice
gt; > Alexandre Christe 於 2023年8月22日 週二 上午2:58寫道：
> > > Dear ConTeXt users,
> > >
> > > Time goes by but I haven't yet found a nice solution to this issue. When
> > > having mathematics, I'd not like to adjust by hand the factor of
> > > \linewidth for the \go
solution to this issue. When
> having mathematics, I'd not like to adjust by hand the factor of \linewidth
> for the \godown command.
>
> Here's a MWE
>
> \starttext
>
> \startitemize[n][style=\bf]
> \item \godown[-\lineheight] \startitemize
> [a,columns,four,packed,
Dear ConTeXt users,
Time goes by but I haven't yet found a nice solution to this issue. When
having mathematics, I'd not like to adjust by hand the factor of \linewidth
for the \godown command.
Here's a MWE
\starttext
\startitemize[n][style=\bf]
\item \godown[-\lineheight] \startitemize
49-1 (texlive-most)
> TeX Live - Packages for drawings graphics
> local/texlive-science 2023.66461-1 (texlive-most)
> TeX Live - Typesetting for mathematics, natural and computer sciences
>
>
> Any hints?
The ConTeXt distribution doesn't contain any packages/modu
TeX Live binaries
local/texlive-core 2023.66587-1 (texlive-most)
TeX Live core distribution
local/texlive-pictures 2023.66549-1 (texlive-most)
TeX Live - Packages for drawings graphics
local/texlive-science 2023.66461-1 (texlive-most)
TeX Live - Typesetting for mathematics, natural
]
\setupbodyfont[mypalatinoeuler]
\starttext
$x=1$
\stoptext
Result:
mathematics > tweak > 'Neo-Euler', size 7, math size 3, version
'Version 000.002' found, version 'Version 000.002 ' expected
tex error > tex error on line 5 in file ./euler_problem.tex:
lua error:
registered func
(texlive-most)
> TeX Live - Additional BibTeX styles and bibliography databases
> local/texlive-bin 2023.66539-1
> TeX Live binaries
> local/texlive-core 2023.66587-1 (texlive-most)
> TeX Live core distribution
> local/texlive-pictures 2023.66549-1 (texlive-most)
> T
live-pictures 2023.66549-1 (texlive-most)
TeX Live - Packages for drawings graphics
local/texlive-publishers 2023.66550-1 (texlive-most)
TeX Live - LaTeX classes and packages for specific publishers
local/texlive-science 2023.66461-1 (texlive-most)
TeX Live - Typesetting for mathematic
> level 1, order 2, name './atestinlucida-context-55.mkiv'
fonts > preloading latin modern fonts (second stage)
mathematics > tweak > 'LatinModernMath-Regular', size 6, math size 3,
version 'Version 1.959' found, version 'Version 1.958' expected
fonts > '
Hi Hans,
> On Dec 6, 2022, at 2:15 AM, Hans Hagen via ntg-context
> wrote:
> On 12/6/2022 12:39 AM, Gavin via ntg-context wrote:
>> 1) Is there a mathematics version of \hpos? The contents of \hpos are set as
>> text, even when \hpos is in mathematics, so I wrote an
On 12/6/2022 12:39 AM, Gavin via ntg-context wrote:
Hello List,
I am working on a project which combines graphics with formulas, like this:
My code for creating this formula is attached. It works well, but I have a
couple of questions that could make it work better.
1) Is there a mathematics
Hello List,
I am working on a project which combines graphics with formulas, like this:
hposQuestion.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
My code for creating this formula is attached. It works well, but I have a
couple of questions that could make it work better.
1) Is there a mathematics
ntg-context wrote:
>> Hello Mikael,
>> Thanks for your solution; it works just fine. I am not familiar with how you
>> defined the pmatrix. Any links to manuals to learn such definitions? Also,
>> this is the second thing I have tried to adapt from typesetting mathematics
mathematics in plain TeX that didn’t work. I tried to draw commutative
diagrams some time back using \diagram{…} which didn’t work(Got the idea
from the book “A beginner’s book of TeX” pg. 161 by Seroul et al ).
I guess what I am asking is that, what are the limits of what I can use
out-of-the-box
Hello Mikael,
Thanks for your solution; it works just fine. I am not familiar with how you
defined the pmatrix. Any links to manuals to learn such definitions? Also, this
is the second thing I have tried to adapt from typesetting mathematics in plain
TeX that didn’t work. I tried to draw
t the warnings I
don't like:
========
mathematics > tweak > 'XITSMath-Regular', size 6pt, math size 3,
version 'Version 1.200' found, version 'Version 1.302' expected
mathematics > tweak > 'XITSMath-Bold', size 6pt, math size 3,
version 'V
gs I
don't like:
========
mathematics > tweak > 'XITSMath-Regular', size 6pt, math size 3,
version 'Version 1.200' found, version 'Version 1.302' expected
mathematics > tweak > 'XITSMath-Bold', size 6pt, math size 3,
version 'Version 1.109' found, version 'Version 1.302' expecte
abs/1102.2684},
year = {2011},
}
@book{vaart1998_asymptoticstatistics,
author = {Vaart, A. W. van der},
collection = {Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics},
doi= {10.1017/CBO9780511802256},
localfile = {Vaart1998_AsymptoticStatistics.pdf},
pl
college
assignments and work, so sorry for that... I just updated today]
I have tested out most of my documents (some with many MetaFun diagrams) and
all work well!
I have several documents which are very mathematics-heavy and all of those work
great as well. In fact, I also noticed some improvements
ome college
assignments and work, so sorry for that... I just updated today]
I have tested out most of my documents (some with many MetaFun diagrams) and
all work well!
I have several documents which are very mathematics-heavy and all of those work
great as well. In fact, I also noticed some
On 1/26/2022 10:07 PM, jbf via ntg-context wrote:
Just be careful, though (writing as a native English speaker), because
the word 'polymath' for English speaker is not a reference to
mathematicians at all. (Greek/mathē/ means 'learning' not mathematics).
Translators are well aware
Just be careful, though (writing as a native English speaker), because
the word 'polymath' for English speaker is not a reference to
mathematicians at all. (Greek/mathē/ means 'learning' not mathematics).
Translators are well aware of the danger of homonyms, and if you go for
a title like
at is nice!
There is also this fascinating book which covers the non-European
history of mathematics (a lot of which in ancient times was to do
with units and measurements but more importantly, calculations):
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691135267/the-crest-of-the-peacock
Yes, that’
india
Oh, that is nice!
There is also this fascinating book which covers the non-European history of
mathematics (a lot of which in ancient times was to do with units and
measurements but more importantly, calculations):
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691135267/the-crest-of-t
/mathematicsmiscellany/time-measurement-in-ancient-india
There is also this fascinating book which covers the non-European history of
mathematics (a lot of which in ancient times was to do with units and
measurements but more importantly, calculations):
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback
it got more complicated than that (particularly for time). See, for example:
https://sites.google.com/site/mathematicsmiscellany/time-measurement-in-ancient-india
There is also this fascinating book which covers the non-European history of
mathematics (a lot of which in ancient times was to do with unit
, which tends to depend on what kind of mathematics are in
between, so it's not constant.
Has anyone else noticed this too?
It can depend on the ht/dp ratio of the font, so maybe you need to adapt
that (when setting up linespacing).
Hans
Dear list,
I've noticed that in my document the linespacing (verified
with \the\baselineskip) is not consistent across the whole document.
In the first section, it's fine (no maths). Later on, it gets increased by
some amount, which tends to depend on what kind of mathematics are in
between, so
Thank you Luigi !
"Quite old" doesn't matter. The date of the wiki page from Thomas is
2010... And my own contribution to first steps with ConTeXt (in French
and not for mathematics) through a Wikibook is no more valuable, full of
errors and obsolete on many aspects
(https://fr.wik
x files containing Unicode are no longer
> sanitary. However, ConTeXt has so many remarkable features that the
> very thought of having to go back to (Xe)LaTeX (just for harfbuzz
> rendering) causes me immense pain. As far as I am concerned, in every
> other way ConTeXt simply has no ma
that the very thought of having to go back to (Xe)LaTeX
(just for harfbuzz rendering) causes me immense pain. As far as I am
concerned, in every other way ConTeXt simply has no match in the (Xe)LaTeX
world. In my usage of ConTeXt for my academic work (in English with lots of
mathematics) I have
On 12/13/2021 6:57 PM, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
which indeed makes
\starttext
\mathematics{$text$}
\stoptext
a puzzle
Isn't that effectively:
$\relax$text$\relax$
which prevents the $$ lookup.
Indeed, you solved
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> which indeed makes
>
> \starttext
> \mathematics{$text$}
> \stoptext
>
> a puzzle
Isn't that effectively:
$\relax$text$\relax$
which prevents th
-mkiv manual, so I'm
asking whether this is supported behaviour or just a bug?
I would say that this is unsupported expected behaviour ;)
It is better not to use $ at all (except when using it as a dollar sign when
\asciimode is active).
\starttext
% All the same
\mathematics{math $text here
so
> I'm asking whether this is supported behaviour or just a bug?
I would say that this is unsupported expected behaviour ;)
It is better not to use $ at all (except when using it as a dollar sign when
\asciimode is active).
>
> \starttext
> % All the same
> \mathematics{math $text here$
Dear list,
I was playing around and found that nesting $$s inside of \m blocks
typesets the code as text.
I can't find anything about this on the wiki or in the math-mkiv manual, so
I'm asking whether this is supported behaviour or just a bug?
Jack
\starttext
% All the same
\mathematics{math
:
\setupbodyfont[lucidaot]
\definemathstackers[MySymbol]
[voffset=-1.4\mathexheight, % -.8\mathexheight
hoffset=\zeropoint,
mathclass=ord,
topoffset=.3\mathemwidth, % poor man's italic correction
middlecommand=\mathematics]
\define[1]\interior{\mathover[MySymbol
:
\setupbodyfont[lucidaot]
\definemathstackers[MySymbol]
[voffset=-1.4\mathexheight, % -.8\mathexheight
hoffset=\zeropoint,
mathclass=ord,
topoffset=.3\mathemwidth, % poor man's italic correction
middlecommand=\mathematics]
\define[1]\interior{\mathover[MySymbol
en which I'd need to typeset a genealogical table.
> >
> > Now, the commands \downbracefill and \upbracefill are no context commands.
> > Please, are there correspondings to them?
> $\overbrace{\hbox{}}$
>
> \mathem
ds.
Please, are there correspondings to them?
$\overbrace{\hbox{xxxx}}$
\mathematics{\overbrace{\hbox{}}}
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061
On 10/10/2021 5:45 AM, Jason Ross via ntg-context wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to provide more support for LaTeX math for an Org Mode
exporter for ConTeXt. LaTeX is the de facto standard for mathematics in
Org Mode. However, the syntax is quite different between LaTeX and
ConTeXt. I have a few
Hello,
I'm trying to provide more support for LaTeX math for an Org Mode
exporter for ConTeXt. LaTeX is the de facto standard for mathematics in
Org Mode. However, the syntax is quite different between LaTeX and
ConTeXt. I have a few ideas, but none that I'm happy about.
1. Export LaTeX
id
> not venture
> to ask earlier on since I had not read much of the documentaion. Now, after
> having read quite a bit, I have mustered up the courage to ask here. As a
> stop-gap solution, I defined another font alternative with
> \definefontalternative[rk]
> and used that wit
' where necessary.
I have completely migrated (away from (Xe)LaTeX )to ConTeXt for all my
university work which is in English with lots of mathematics. I am by no means
an expert but I have learned very much about ConTeXt by reading the excellent
wiki, documentation and mailing list. I have no issues
astermind_ x
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Juni 2021 13:36
An: ntg-context@ntg.nl<mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Betreff: [NTG-context] Project structure: Specifying environment in component
Hello everyone,
I am creating a project of notes across different areas of mathematics I am
studying and the st
d_ x
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Juni 2021 13:36
> An: ntg-context@ntg.nl
> Betreff: [NTG-context] Project structure: Specifying environment in component
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am creating a project of notes across different areas of mathematics I am
> studying and t
across different areas of mathematics I am
studying and the structure looks like this:
env_notes.tex
project_notes.tex
geogroups/groups-prd_geometry-groups.tex
geogroups/groups-c_chapter1.tex
I am following this wiki: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Project_structure
My question is: Why do I need
Hello everyone,
I am creating a project of notes across different areas of mathematics I am
studying and the structure looks like this:
env_notes.tex
project_notes.tex
geogroups/groups-prd_geometry-groups.tex
geogroups/groups-c_chapter1.tex
I am following this wiki: https
sn't
> work (even inside a formula), since \in is used for references in ConTeXt.
> And in fact the link on the Basic Math page for \in takes you to the
> explanation of \in as used for ConTeXt references.
>
> This is a very common character in mathematics, so I wanted to ask: what
for "is an element of" a set).
…
> This is a very common character in mathematics, so I wanted to ask: what is
> the recommended way to type this character? (I'm hoping to avoid having to
> cut and paste the character into the document every time I want to use it.
> And I don't have
t
> work (even inside a formula), since \in is used for references in ConTeXt.
> And in fact the link on the Basic Math page for \in takes you to the
> explanation of \in as used for ConTeXt references.
>
> This is a very common character in mathematics, so I wanted to ask: what is
> the
like an epsilon, and
> which is the mathematical symbol for "is an element of" a set).
…
> This is a very common character in mathematics, so I wanted to ask: what is
> the recommended way to type this character? (I'm hoping to avoid having to
> cut and paste the character into
't
work (even inside a formula), since \in is used for references in ConTeXt.
And in fact the link on the Basic Math page for \in takes you to the
explanation of \in as used for ConTeXt references.
This is a very common character in mathematics, so I wanted to ask: what is
the recommended way to type
eferences in ConTeXt.
And in fact the link on the Basic Math page for \in takes you to the
explanation of \in as used for ConTeXt references.
This is a very common character in mathematics, so I wanted to ask: what is
the recommended way to type this character? (I'm hoping to avoid having to
cut and
even if you don't have mathematics in
your text where you use that font, ConTeXt may pick some characters from math
fonts. So in my opinion you should define a whole font family named
mychapterfont, where in particular the sans serif comes from what you are
indicating.
The second point
\definesymbol[Fin][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{%
\ifmmode
\inrightmargin{\hskip-7.5mm\symbol[Fin]} % --> attention here
\else
\dontleavehmode\wordright{\symbol[Fin]}
\fi}
\setupformulas[location=left]
\starttext
One s
Fabrice Couvreur schrieb am 05.08.2020 um 19:33:
Hello,
I also use a square to complete a demonstration. I tried this without
success
Thank you
Fabrice
\definesymbol[Fin][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\strut\wordright{\symbol[Fin]}}
\defineenumeration
[proof]
[...,
closesymbol
Hello,
I also use a square to complete a demonstration. I tried this without
success
Thank you
Fabrice
\definesymbol[Fin][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\strut\wordright{\symbol[Fin]}}
\defineenumeration
[proof]
[text=Démonstration,
alternative=serried,
distance=\zeropoint,
number
-qed.tex
\definesymbol[Fin][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\ifmmode\quad\symbol[Fin]\else\strut\wordright{\symbol[Fin]}\fi}
\starttext
\startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2.
\stopformula
\startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2. \qed
\stopformula
One sees that\type{\qed} in the formula changes the alignment
seems to be \wordright, but
although the following minimal example shows a bug it does not produce the same
ERROR output page:
the square ''end of proof''
\definesymbol[Fin][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\wordright{\symbol[Fin]}}
\starttext
\startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\stopformula
\qed
the following minimal example shows a bug it does not produce the same
ERROR output page:
the square ''end of proof''
\definesymbol[Fin][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\wordright{\symbol[Fin]}}
\starttext
\startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\stopformula
\qed % the problem is here
\stoptext
Hello,
I replaced the context engine with the lmtx engine but I find that the
derivative symbol is too high regardless of the font used.
I mainly use modern and pagella because I type many texts using
mathematics: can we correct this problem,
Thanks for your help.
Fabrice
\starttext
\startitemize
1 2%
mathematics 3694211%
nan 650 57288%
None 1269 118 9%
pdf 2289943%
references 804253%
rules854553%
structure 892 56764%
symbols 1101917%
system3
Hello everyone and in particular to Wolfgang who has already provided me
with the solution below. I will have to write a Mathematics book for my
students and the remarks and graphics should be in the right margin. I got
the code written by Wolfgang and tried to include the graphics
nd I'll go back and read through the mathematics document again,
and more closely this time!
(For matrices and arrays I still prefer the neat LaTeX implementation, but
maybe that's simply my general unfamiliarity with ConTeXt.) Thanks again!
Alasdair
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:27 AM Aditya Maha
pler to do it some hand written regex which translate commands
according to my writing style.
I can get easily lost on the ConTeXt site: the documentation is there in
plenty, but seems hard to search. The main problem for me is mathematics
and alignment: not just for equations, but for matrices
liant", and generates errors instead of compiling.
I can get easily lost on the ConTeXt site: the documentation is there in
plenty, but seems hard to search. The main problem for me is mathematics
and alignment: not just for equations, but for matrices and arrays. What
I'd love - if it exists - is
mathematics textbooks in France). So when I use mkiv the result is the one I like and is attached to this message (test-scriptfonts-mkiv.pdf). However, thanks to your message I went to check, and noticed that lmtx does not give the same math script fonts, and I don't know what has changed between mkiv
=ord,
topoffset=.3\mathemwidth, % poor man's italic correction
middlecommand=\mathematics]
%\define[1]\interior{\mathover[MySymbol]{"2218}{#1}} %2218 U+00B0
\define[1]\interior{\mathover[MySymbol]{176}{#1}} %2218 U+00B0
\starttext
The interior of a set $A$ is denoted by $\int
https://dave.autonoma.ca/blog/2019/08/06/typesetting-markdown-part-7/
This installment tackles a cost-benefit analysis problem comparing
electric to gasoline-powered vehicles, calls into R for amortization,
typesets math and a repayment schedule, continues to explore the
separation of content
asses and annotations. I looked into the pandoc-xhtml link and it
> looked both incomplete and lacking support for typesetting mathematics.
Hi Dave,
pandoc-xhtml is only a poor example about handling XML as input source.
I only use Markdown and pandoc, because they provide a limited way of
c's markdown, so will have to check the docs in
regard.
> I looked into the pandoc-xhtml link and it looked both incomplete and
> lacking support for typesetting mathematics.
For Markdown --> ConTeXt usage, math is not my primary concern, but
wonder what do you think about the Pand
both
incomplete and lacking support for typesetting mathematics.
Have a read and let me know what you think!
Thank you for the feedback.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
text from the pdf, e.g., \CATCA becomes 퓒nt.
OTOH, issues 4.i and 4.ii below are still perplexing. Are there any
workarounds?
Thanks again.
Best wishes
Idris
> Hamid,Idris schrieb am 03.05.2019 um 21:40:
>> Dear gang,
>>
>> Ok, I've made some progress:
>>
>> 1. tex-
1 - 100 of 681 matches
Mail list logo
